Bitcoin Core writer and Ciphrex CEO Eric Lombrozo was recently interviewed on Epicenter Bitcoin, and he used a apportionment of his time to explain some misconceptions and misunderstandings associated to a block distance extent debate.
While a concentration of this growth discuss has especially centered on a tangible retard distance metric in a Bitcoin protocol, Lombrozo says this misses a categorical indicate of disagreement. In his view, a hard fork is what a Bitcoin Core growth village would like to equivocate over a brief term.
The Hard Fork Is a Issue
When explaining a full design of a retard distance debate, Lombrozo done a indicate that a non-technical Bitcoin village (likely a anxiety to Bitcoin subreddits) might not have had a full design of what was going on in a growth village behind in May of 2015. Lombrozo described a discuss that took place among developers during this duration of time:
“I consider that a lot of a non-technical village and a open were not unequivocally witnessing accurately a whole growth as distant as what a developers were doing. Way behind in May, we were already articulate about deliberation these ideas when it was initial proposed