Bitcoin right now is not unequivocally anonymous. While Bitcoin addresses aren’t indispensably related to real-world identities, they can be. Monitoring a unencrypted peer-to-peer network, analyses of a open blockchain and Know Your Customer (KYC) process or Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations can exhibit a lot about who’s regulating Bitcoin and for what.
This is not good from a remoteness perspective. For example, Bitcoin users competence not indispensably wish a universe to know where they spend their money, what they acquire or how many they own; similarly, businesses might not wish to trickle transaction sum to competitors.
Additionally, a fact that a transaction story of any bitcoin is traceable puts a fungibility of all bitcoins during risk. “Tainted” bitcoins, for example, might be valued reduction than other bitcoins, presumably even job into doubt Bitcoin’s value tender as money.
There are intensity solutions that might boost remoteness and urge fungibility in Bitcoin. But many of these solutions are possibly partial, works-in-progress or only mostly theoretical.
The Bitcoin Scenario
Perhaps a categorical reason Bitcoin does not offer a whole lot of privacy