Jim Harper is a comparison associate during a Cato Institute, operative to adjust law and process to a information age. A former warn to committees in both a US House and a US Senate, he served as Global Policy Counsel for a Bitcoin Foundation in 2014.
In this article, Harper discusses a hurdles of requesting normal open-source development practices to a blockchain world, and since he believes a ongoing scaling debate, while heated, will be stronger as a result.
A few weeks ago, in a post entitled, “The Politics of Non-Political Money,” we talked about a bitcoin retard distance discuss as surfacing “politics” in a bitcoin ecosystem.
Important custom and program growth projects need people of manifold views and skeleton to come together over common standards and code. My topic in that post was simply that good function is good politics since it builds credibility.
Some differ, and many – it should be no warn – aren’t holding my advice. But a precedents set in a retard distance discuss are critical for a destiny of bitcoin, for other cryptocurrencies, and for identical projects that might offer alternatives to bureaucratic financial and executive systems.